2008 Survey of Travel by R.O.C Citizens
Executive Summary
The objectives of this study are to understand, in 2008, citizens’ traveling activities, degree of satisfaction and amounts spent on different types of vacation expenses on each trip; and to learn the mutual effects of domestic tourism and outbound travels. It also provides estimates on domestic tourism expenditures and foreign exchange spent on oversea travels. The results of this study provide policy makers needed information on developing new tourist facilities, improving traveling environments, upgrading the quality of tourism and initiating new tourism policies. The population of this survey includes all R.O.C. citizens who were 12 years or older in 2008. The survey period covered from January1, 2008 through December 31, 2008.
This survey was designed primarily to collect domestic tourism data. However, outbound traveling data was also collected as a secondary objective. The survey interviews were conducted by telephone, using a computer-assisted telephone interviewing system (CATI). A stratified random sampling was used to select the sample. The total initial sample was divided into four panels; and a rotation scheme was instituted so that each sample person was interviewed once every quarter for four consecutive quarters. However, sample of each quarter composed of four panels that first panel was interviewed the first time; second panel was interviewed the second time; third panel was interviewed the third time; and the fourth panel was interviewed the fourth time. The numbers of completed domestic tourism interviews were as follows: first quarter 4,553 persons, second quarter 4,567 persons, third quarter 4,543 persons and fourth quarter 4,543 persons. The completed outbound interviews were fewer: first quarter 273 persons, second quarter 321 persons, third quarter 370 persons and fourth quarter 276 persons.
The survey results are summarized in the following in two parts: important indexes of domestic and outbound travels and statistical analysis.
I、Important Indexes of Domestic and Outbound Travels
A. R.O.C. Citizens’ Domestic Tourist Travel Index
Table 1 R.O.C. Citizens’ Domestic Tourist Travel Index
|
Item |
2008 |
2007 |
Change |
|
92.5% |
90.7% |
An increase of 1.8% |
|
|
4.81 trips |
5.57 trips |
A decrease of 0.76 trips |
|
|
96,197,000 trips |
110,253,000 trips |
A decrease of 12.7% |
|
|
1.66 places |
1.64 places |
No significant change |
|
|
1.51 days |
1.52 days |
No significant change |
|
|
74.2% |
75.5% |
A decrease of 1.3% |
|
|
97.2% |
96.3% |
An increase of 0.9% |
|
|
NT$1,268 (US$40.17) |
NT$1,309 (US$39.79) |
NT:A decrease of 3.1% (US:No significant change) |
|
|
NT$1,915 (US$60.67) |
NT$1,989 (US$60.47) |
NT:A decrease of 3.7% (US:No significant change) |
|
|
NT$184.2 billions (US$5.836 billions) |
NT$219.3 billions (US$6.667 billions) |
NT:A decrease of 16.0% (US:A decrease of 12.5%) |
Note: 1.The population of this survey includes all R.O.C. citizens who were 12 years or older.
2. “No significant change” means there is no significant difference under
significance level ![]()
3. Proportion of people taking domestic tourist travel=the percentage of total population in
Taiwan who at least took one time domestic tourist travel during that year.
B. R.O.C. Citizens’ Outbound Travel Index
Table 2 R.O.C. Citizens’ Outbound Travel Index
|
Item |
2008 |
2007 |
Change |
|
19.6% |
19.4% |
No significant change |
|
|
8,465,172 trips |
8,963,712 trips |
A decrease of 5.6% |
|
|
0.37 trip |
0.39 trip |
No significant change |
|
|
9.7 nights |
9.8 nights |
A decrease of 0.1 night |
|
|
NT$48,834 (US$1,547) |
NT$48,227 (US$1,466) |
NT$: No significant change (US$: An increase of 5.5%) |
|
|
NT$413.4 billions (US$13.139 billions) |
NT$432.3 billions (US$13.142 billions) |
NT$: A decrease of 4.4% (US$: No significant change) |
Note:1. The data source of Total number of trips taken by all citizens and the average number of nights per trip: Monthly Statistics on Tourism.
2. “No significant change” means there is no significant difference under
significance level
.
3. Average number of outbound trips per person = total number of outbound trips /the average of 12 months total population in Taiwan .
4. Average expenditure per person trip is estimated based only on trips with 60 nights or fewer.
5. Proportion of people taking outbound travels= the percentage of total population in Taiwan who at least took one time outbound trip during that year.
6. Exchange rate is the average of 12 months spot exchang rate N.T/$ of that year.
II、Statistical Analysis
A. Domestic Travels
1. 93% citizens had domestic travels in 2008, higher than 91% of 2007: During the year of 2008, the domestic travel rate was: 1st Quarter: 71.4%, 2nd Quarter: 64.8%, 3rd Quarter: 64.5%, 4th Quarter: 64.0%. The first quarter’s domestic travel rate was the highest. The proportion of people who traveled was higher than that of 2007 in the first and third quarter, but was not significantly different from that of 2007 in second quarter and forth quarter. 92.5% of the citizens 12 years or older traveled at least once domestically, an increase of 2% from 2007.
Table 3 Proportions of People Having Domestic Travels
Unit: %
|
Year |
1st Quarter |
2nd Quarter |
3rd Quarter |
4th Quarter |
Whole Year |
|
2008 |
71.4 |
64.8 |
64.5 |
64.0 |
92.5 |
|
2007 |
69.4 |
63.4 |
62.6 |
63.5 |
90.7 |
Note: Travel rate:travel at least once domestically during a period.
2. The estimated total number of domestic tourist trips taken by citizens of 12 years or older reached 96.20 millions, a decrease of 12.7% from the previous year: The average number of trips per person during the year 2008 was 4.81, a decrease of 0.76 trips from 5.57in 2007. The estimated total number of domestic tourist trips taken by citizens of 12 years or older was 96,200,000 trips. And the total number of trips traveled by all citizens was estimated at 113,300,000 person-trips.
Table 4 Average number of domestic trips per person
Unit: Frecrency
|
Year |
1st Quarter |
2nd Quarter |
3rd Quarter |
4th Quarter |
Whole Year |
|
2008 |
1.42 |
1.11 |
1.21 |
1.07 |
4.81 |
|
2007 |
1.43 |
1.41 |
1.42 |
1.31 |
5.57 |
3. “Wished to travel but did not have time” was the main reason for people not having domestic travel, “Wished to travel but could not afford” had an increase of 10% from that of 2007: During the year of 2008, 7% of people did not take any domestic tourist travel. And the leading reason for not traveling was “Wished to travel but did not have time” (49%); the second major reason was “Wished to travel but could not afford” (23%); the third major reasons were “Wished to travel but had poor health” (14%) and “Not interested in traveling” (12%). Compared with 2007, we found that “Wished to travel but could not afford” had an increase of 10% from that of 2007.
Table 5 Reasons for not traveling
Unit: %
|
Item |
2008 |
2007 |
|
100.0 |
100.0 |
|
|
48.8 |
48.7 |
|
|
23.0 |
13.2 |
|
|
14.2 |
16.4 |
|
|
11.7 |
16.7 |
|
|
1.0 |
1.8 |
|
|
0.8 |
1.2 |
|
|
0.3 |
— |
|
|
0.2 |
0.6 |
|
|
— |
0.6 |
|
|
— |
0.2 |
|
|
— |
— |
|
|
— |
0.6 |
Note: “—” means no sample in the cell.
4. Domestic tourist trips made on weekends increased: 63% of the domestic tourist trips were taken on weekends, an increase of 5% from that of 2007. 11% of the domestic trips were taken on national holidays, a decrease of 6% from that of 2007. As for the purposes of the domestic travels, 79% were for “sightseeing, recreation, vacation” an increase of 3% from that of 2007, followed by “visiting friends and relatives” (20%). “Religious travels” had a decrease of 2% from 2007.
Table 6 Day Used For Domestic Tourist Travel
Unit: %
|
Day of Travel |
2008 |
2007 |
|
|
Total |
100.0 |
100.0 |
|
|
National Holidays |
Sub Total |
11.4 |
17.2 |
|
Lunar New Year holidays* |
7.7 |
10.0 |
|
|
Tomb sweeping Festival* |
1.7 |
— |
|
|
Dragon boat Festival* |
— |
1.0 |
|
|
Moon Festival* |
— |
1.4 |
|
|
Double Tenth Day* |
0.4 |
— |
|
|
Other national holidays |
1.5 |
4.8 |
|
|
Weekends |
62.8 |
58.3 |
|
|
Weekdays |
Sub Total |
25.8 |
24.5 |
|
Annual leaves |
8.4 |
6.9 |
|
|
Summer or winter breaks |
2.7 |
2.4 |
|
|
Other weekdays |
14.7 |
15.2 |
|
Note:1.“*” means National Holidays which were continuous holidays during that year,“—” means not continuous holidays.
2. Other national holidays included other national holidays and not continuous National holidays.
Table 7 Purposes of Domestic Tourist Travels
Unit: %
|
Purpose of the Trip |
2008 |
2007 |
|
|
Total |
100.0 |
100.0 |
|
|
Sightseeing, Recreation, Vacation |
Sub Total |
78.7 |
78.3 |
|
Pure Sightseeing, Recreation, Vacation |
63.3 |
60.8 |
|
|
Physical exercising vacations |
7.1 |
7.2 |
|
|
Ecological tours |
2.9 |
2.7 |
|
|
Conference or Studying Tour |
0.7 |
0.8 |
|
|
Religious travels |
4.8 |
6.8 |
|
|
Business and tourist travel |
1.0 |
1.1 |
|
|
Visiting friends and relatives |
19.9 |
19.7 |
|
|
Others |
0.4 |
0.9 |
|
5. 69% of the domestic tourist trips were one-day trips: For the year 2008, about 66% of the trips were taken within the living region of the travelers (not significantly different from that of 2007); observing based on traveler’s residence region, we found that in all regions, most of the trips were conducted within the same region that they live in, especially in the south region (73%). As for duration of the trips, most of them (69%) were one-day trips, followed by 20% of two-day trips, 8% of three-day trips. Average duration of a trip was 1.51 days (not significantly different from that of 2007)
Table 8 2008 Proportion of Tourists Visited Each Region by Region of Residence
Unit: Row %
|
Region Visited Residence |
North Region |
Central Region |
South Region |
East Region |
Kin-Mar Region |
|
North Region |
65.0 |
24.5 |
17.5 |
6.5 |
0.3 |
|
Central Region |
26.1 |
58.2 |
24.0 |
4.5 |
0.3 |
|
South Region |
15.9 |
19.0 |
73.0 |
5.6 |
0.2 |
|
East Region |
34.6 |
14.6 |
18.7 |
52.5 |
0.2 |
|
Kim-Mar Region |
41.3 |
12.0 |
13.5 |
7.6 |
50.0 |
|
Total |
41.0 |
31.3 |
34.4 |
6.6 |
0.4 |
Note: 1.This item was multi-choice
2.The percentage of the trips were taken within the living region of the travelers (66%) = the total number of
the trips conducted within the same region that they live in /total person-trips in 2008.
Table 9 Distribution on Duration of Tourist Trips
Unit: %
|
Number of Days Traveled |
2008 |
2007 |
|
1 Day |
68.9 |
69.9 |
|
2 Days |
20.2 |
18.9 |
|
3 Days |
8.0 |
7.7 |
|
4 days or more |
2.8 |
3.4 |
|
Average duration of each trip |
1.51days |
1.52 days |
6. Most of over-night tourists stayed in hotels or friend’s or relative’s places: According to the survey, in domestic trips, 69% of them were same-day returns. 14% stayed in hotels, 11% in friend’s or relative’s places, and 5% in home stays. The percentages of other types of accommodation were very low. Compared with 2007, there was no significant difference from that of 2007.
Table 10 Distribution of Accommodation Choices
Unit: %
|
Accommodation Choice |
2008 |
2007 |
|
Total |
100.0 |
100.0 |
|
Same-day return |
68.9 |
69.9 |
|
Hotel |
13.5 |
12.8 |
|
Friend’s or relative’s places |
11.1 |
11.2 |
|
Home stays |
5.0 |
4.3 |
|
Reception house or activity center |
0.9 |
1.0 |
|
Camping |
0.6 |
0.6 |
|
Others |
0.1 |
0.1 |
7. Almost 90% of the tourist trips were completely planned by tourists’ themselves; most of them obtained travel information from friends, relatives, colleagues or classmates: Majority of the tourists planned their trips completely by themselves (87%), while other types of planning were each used by less than 7% of the tourists. As for travel information, 53% of tourists obtained it from friends, relatives, colleagues or classmates, 28% of them obtained it through Internet, 13% of them obtained it from electronic media. There were 4% of tourists had purchased traveling related products through internet; most of them were hotel reservations.
Table 11 Types of Travels
Unit: %
|
Types of Travels |
2008 |
2007 |
|
Total |
100.0 |
100.0 |
|
Tours planned by tourists’ themselves |
87.4 |
88.6 |
|
Tours planned by other groups |
6.5 |
5.5 |
|
Tours planned by employers |
2.7 |
2.3 |
|
Tours planned by religion groups |
1.4 |
1.5 |
|
Tours planned by schools or classes |
1.3 |
1.4 |
|
Package tours by travel agencies |
0.6 |
0.7 |
|
Others |
0.0 |
0.1 |
Note: “0.0”means the percentage was under 0.05.
Table 12 Sources of Travel Information
Unit: %
|
Information Sources |
2008 |
2007 |
|
Friends, Relatives, Colleagues, Classmates |
52.7 |
53.0 |
|
Internet |
27.6 |
25.3 |
|
Electronic Media |
12.9 |
16.1 |
|
Print Media |
10.7 |
12.3 |
|
Travel Agencies |
3.1 |
2.1 |
|
Tourism Bureau or Agencies |
2.9 |
3.0 |
|
Tourism Shows or Exhibits |
1.0 |
0.7 |
|
Others |
0.5 |
0.7 |
Note: 1. This item was multi-choice .Tourists who did not obtain travel information were excluded.
2. Electronic Media includes television, broadcasting, and billboard, etc.
3. Print Media includes traveling books, newspapers, and magazines, etc.
Table 13 Purchasing Traveling Related Products through Internet
Unit: %
|
Situations |
2008 |
2007 |
||
|
100.0 |
100.0 |
|||
|
95.9 |
95.6 |
|||
|
4.1 |
4.4 |
|||
|
3.1 |
3.2 |
|||
|
0.6 |
0.5 |
|||
|
0.3 |
0.1 |
|||
|
─ |
0.1 |
|||
|
0.3 |
0.4 |
|||
|
0.1 |
0.2 |
|||
|
0.1 |
0.2 |
|||
Note: 1.” Did not answer”means tourists did not answer purchased train ticket was Taiwan Railway or Taiwan High speed rail.
2. The purchase percentage of the item =the number of person-trips that did purchase the items/total number of person-trips in 2008.
3. “—” means no sample in the cell.
8. The most important factor considered by the tourists when they chose visiting places was “beautiful natural scenery”, followed by“Visiting relatives or friends”and“Convenient transportation”. The “Natural scenery sightseeing activities” was the tourists’ most favorite activity: The most important factor considered by the tourists when they chose visiting places was “beautiful natural scenery”, followed by“visiting relatives or friends”and“convenient transportation”. As for tourists’ favorite activities, the percentage of the “Natural scenery sightseeing activities” was the highest. On the regional comparison in the favorite activities, we found that North region had higher percentage of tourists enjoying “Tasting good foods, tea or coffee” and “shopping” than other regions; “Religious activities” in the Central was higher than other regions; “Visiting cultural and historical sites” in the South was higher than other regions; “Natural scenery sightseeing activities” and “Hot spring, SPA” in the East were higher than other regions.
Table 14 The tourists’ considerations while choosing the travel place (degree of importance)
Unit: %
|
Considerations |
2008 |
2007 |
|
100.0 |
100.0 |
|
|
17.3 (1) |
16.9 (1) |
|
|
14.1 (2) |
14.8 (2) |
|
|
13.6 (2) |
13.0 (3) |
|
|
12.0 (4) |
11.9 (4) |
|
|
8.1 (5) |
7.3 (5) |
|
|
6.8 (6) |
7.1 (5) |
|
|
6.8 (6) |
7.6 (5) |
|
|
6.4 (6) |
5.9 (8) |
|
|
5.0 (9) |
4.9 (10) |
|
|
4.9 (9) |
5.7 (8) |
|
|
2.2 (11) |
2.4 (11) |
|
|
2.0 (11) |
1.5 (12) |
|
|
0.2 (13) |
0.2 (13) |
|
|
0.1 (13) |
0.1 (13) |
Note: 1.Number inside parenthesis indicates the ranking in the importance of considerations when the travelers choose the places to visit.
2.The same ranking number means the degrees of importance of the items have
no significant difference under significance level![]()
Table 15 The tourists’ favorite activities—by region
Unit: column%
|
Region Visited Activities |
North Region |
Central Region |
South Region |
East Region |
All |
|
49.2 |
45.1 |
46.1 |
73.3 |
47.1 |
|
|
Sightseeing coastal geological scenery, wetland ecology, rural scenery, river, lakes and waterfall, etc. |
25.7 |
15.6 |
24.2 |
49.1 |
22.6 |
|
Camping, mountain climbing, forest hiking |
16.4 |
23.2 |
15.5 |
26.4 |
18.4 |
|
Observing animals or plants (such as flowers, birds, whale, firefly etc.) |
20.5 |
21.0 |
16.5 |
22.5 |
19.1 |
|
Observing sunrises, snow scenes, astronomical phenomena, etc. |
3.0 |
5.5 |
6.9 |
10.9 |
5.1 |
|
21.0 |
28.3 |
24.5 |
21.4 |
22.8 |
|
|
Visiting cultural and historical sites |
5.8 |
6.2 |
8.7 |
4.6 |
6.1 |
|
Attending festivals and shows |
2.8 |
3.9 |
4.1 |
4.1 |
3.6 |
|
Visiting exhibitions (such as museum, etc. ) |
7.0 |
6.4 |
5.3 |
5.8 |
5.7 |
|
Learning traditional craft skills |
0.9 |
0.9 |
0.3 |
0.2 |
0.7 |
|
Indigenous culture experiencing |
0.2 |
1.2 |
0.8 |
3.9 |
0.8 |
|
Religious activities |
5.9 |
11.5 |
7.1 |
3.4 |
7.3 |
|
Farm living experiencing |
1.4 |
2.2 |
1.5 |
4.3 |
1.7 |
|
Experiencing railway’s old time |
0.3 |
1.7 |
0.7 |
─ |
0.8 |
|
6.3 |
5.4 |
8.5 |
12.3 |
6.8 |
|
|
Swimming, diving, etc. |
1.2 |
0.6 |
3.3 |
4.5 |
1.8 |
|
Boating |
0.1 |
0.2 |
0.3 |
2.0 |
0.3 |
|
Cruising |
2.0 |
1.5 |
3.5 |
2.3 |
2.1 |
|
Fishing |
0.6 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
0.3 |
0.4 |
|
Paragliding |
0.0 |
0.1 |
─ |
─ |
0.0 |
|
Amateur ball game (such as golf, tennis, basketball, etc.) |
0.3 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
0.0 |
0.2 |
|
Rock-climbing |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
─ |
0.0 |
|
Stream tracing |
0.2 |
0.2 |
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
|
Grass skiing |
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
0.1 |
|
Riding bicycle |
2.2 |
2.8 |
1.5 |
4.7 |
2.2 |
|
Watching sport games |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
|
4.9 |
5.5 |
2.8 |
4.4 |
3.9 |
|
|
Mechanical amusement park activities |
3.9 |
3.6 |
1.3 |
1.5 |
2.5 |
|
Water amusement park activities |
0.4 |
0.3 |
0.7 |
1.0 |
0.5 |
|
Visiting the shows or programs in the amusement park |
0.4 |
1.3 |
0.8 |
1.5 |
0.8 |
|
Visiting the special subjects in the amusement park |
0.6 |
1.3 |
0.3 |
1.3 |
0.7 |
|
45.1 |
29.9 |
36.4 |
32.5 |
37.0 |
|
|
Driving for fun(cars, motorcycle) |
0.4 |
1.7 |
2.2 |
2.7 |
1.4 |
|
Hot spring, SPA |
6.8 |
4.0 |
3.6 |
15.1 |
5.3 |
|
Tasting good food, tea or coffee |
32.0 |
19.3 |
22.5 |
17.0 |
24.1 |
|
Visiting fruit farms |
0.8 |
2.3 |
0.5 |
0.7 |
1.1 |
|
Shopping |
25.0 |
14.1 |
18.3 |
6.9 |
18.8 |
|
Other |
1.2 |
0.6 |
1.7 |
0.5 |
1.1 |
|
2.0 |
2.5 |
2.5 |
2.4 |
2.4 |
|
|
12.8 |
16.5 |
14.9 |
5.9 |
15.4 |
Note:1. This item was multi-choice. The numerator is the number of answers and the denominator is the number of person trip.
2. The ‘other’ of other recreational activities includes barbecue, singing, etc.“Visit relatives and friends only” includes tomb sweeping.
3. “—” means no sample in the cell; “0.0”means the percentage was under 0.05.
9. “Danshuei and Bali”,“Love River ,Cijin and Sizihwan Resort”were the most popular places: North Region was visited by the largest number of tourists, followed by the South region. Danshuei and Bali”(5%), “Love River ,Cijin and Sizihwan Resort”(5%) were the most popular places for tourists. As for National Parks, Kenting National Park was visited by the largest number of tourists, accounting for 4%. For thirteen National Scenic Areas, Tri-Mountain (4%) was the place with largest number of tourists.
Table 16 Region Visited
Unit: %
|
Region Visited |
Percentage |
|
North Region |
41.0 |
|
Central Region |
31.3 |
|
South Region |
34.4 |
|
East Region |
6.6 |
|
Kim-Mar Region |
0.4 |
Note: 1.This item was multi-choice.
2.North Region:Taipei City, Keelung City, Taipei County, Yilan County, Taoyuan County, Hsinchu County, Hsinchu City.
Central Region:Miaoli County, Taichung County, Taichung City, Changhua County, Nantou County, Yunlin County.
South Region:Chiayi County, Chiayi City, Tainan County, Tainan City, Kaohsiung County, Kaohsiung City, Pingtung County, Penghu County.
East Region:Taidung County, Hualien County.
Kim-Mar Region:Kinmen County, Lienchiang County.
Table 17 The most popular places for tourists in 2008
Unit: %
|
Tourist places |
Percentage |
|
Danshuei and Bali |
5.11 |
|
Love River ,Cijin and Sizihwan Resort |
4.88 |
|
Jiaosi |
2.47 |
|
Fengchia Shopping District |
2.35 |
|
The Sunmoonlake Scenic Area |
2.26 |
|
Anping Fort |
1.76 |
|
Puli |
1.55 |
|
Lugang Mazu Temple |
1.55 |
|
Taipei 101 |
1.42 |
|
Muzha Maokong |
1.40 |
Note: the percentage=the number of person-trips to a tourist place/ total number of person-trips in 2008.
Table 18 2008 Proportion of Tourists Visiting National park and National Scenic Area
Unit:%
|
National Park |
Percentage |
National Scenic Area |
Percentage |
National Scenic Area |
Percentage |
|
Kenting |
3.92 |
Tri-Mountain |
3.71 |
North Coast & Guanyinshan |
1.66 |
|
Yanmingshan |
2.25 |
Sun Moon Lake |
3.01 |
Siraya |
1.50 |
|
Taroko |
1.52 |
East Coast |
2.55 |
Maolin |
1.09 |
|
Shei-Pa |
0.61 |
East Rift Valley |
2.29 |
Tapeng Bay |
0.60 |
|
Kinmen |
0.35 |
Northeast Coast |
1.89 |
Penghu |
0.51 |
|
Yushan |
0.24 |
Southwest Coast |
1.83 |
Matzu |
0.05 |
|
|
|
Alishan |
1.71 |
|
|
Note: The percentage=the number of person-trips to one place of the National Park or the National Scenic Area / total number of person-trips in 2008.
10. Private automobile was the main transportation for most tourists, but the percentage was decreasing the percentage of tourists who used public transportation had increased : Based on this survey, private automobile was the main transportation for most tourists, followed by tour bus;and train (including Taiwan railway and Taiwan high speed rail). Particularly noticeable was that traveled by private automobile decreased, and by public transportation( tour bus、train、Bus and Mass Rapid Transit) increased.
Table 19 Main Transportation in 2008
Unit:%
|
Transportation |
2008 |
2007 |
|||
|
Private automobile |
63.9 |
(1) |
66.6 |
(1) |
|
|
Tour bus |
11.8 |
(2) |
10.5 |
(2) |
|
|
Train |
Taiwan railway |
7.0 |
|
6.0 |
|
|
Taiwan high speed rail |
3.5 |
2.1 |
|||
|
Motorcycle |
9.0 |
(4) |
9.6 |
(2) |
|
|
Bus (Publicly or privately owned) |
8.5 |
(4) |
7.2 |
(5) |
|
|
Mass Rapid Transit (MRT) |
7.6 |
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
Taxi |
1.8 |
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
Boat |
1.5 |
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
Bicycle |
1.4 |
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
Airplane |
1.0 |
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
Tourist special bus |
0.7 |
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
Rental car |
0.6 |
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
Cable car |
0.5 |
|
─ |
|
|
|
Others |
0.2 |
|
0.3 |
|
|
Note: 1.This item was multi-choice.
2. Number inside parenthesis indicates the first 5 places ranking. The same ranking number means the percentages have no significant difference.
3. “—” means no sample in the cell.
4. Adding cable car in 2008.
11. 97% of all tourists were satisfied with the overall impressions of the places visited: 97% of tourists were satisfied with the places they visited, which had an increased of 1% from that of 2007. Tourists were most satisfied with “natural scenery and natural resources protection” (93%), “attendants services” (93%) and “travel safety” (93%). However, tourists were most dissatisfied with “public transportation” (23%), followed by ”parking facilites”(19%), “Entrance ticket prices” (19%), “lavatories”(19%) and “smooth traffic”(17%).
Table 20 Tourists Degree of Satisfaction with Places Visited
Unit: %
|
Items |
Satisfied |
Dissatisfied |
||
|
2008 |
2007 |
2008 |
2007 |
|
|
Overall satisfaction |
97.2 |
96.3 |
2.6 |
3.4 |
|
Natural Scenery and natural resources protection |
93.3 |
91.5 |
5.8 |
7.2 |
|
Attendants Services |
93.2 |
91.9 |
3.8 |
5.1 |
|
Travel Safety |
93.1 |
91.8 |
6.0 |
6.8 |
|
Lodging facilities |
90.5 |
86.1 |
8.4 |
10.1 |
|
Ground maintenance |
89.3 |
88.1 |
10.1 |
11.1 |
|
Food facilities |
86.8 |
86.1 |
11.0 |
11.3 |
|
Smooth traffic |
82.8 |
─ |
16.8 |
─ |
|
Amusement facilities |
82.5 |
83.6 |
9.1 |
9.5 |
|
Signs and directions |
81.7 |
80.9 |
12.5 |
13.6 |
|
Lavatories |
78.7 |
77.2 |
18.9 |
20.0 |
|
Levitation of traffic jams |
─ |
74.4 |
─ |
23.0 |
|
Parking facilities |
73.9 |
74.2 |
19.3 |
20.5 |
|
Entrance ticket prices |
72.7 |
71.4 |
19.0 |
20.9 |
|
Public transportation |
65.3 |
65.9 |
23.2 |
22.9 |
Note:1. “Satisfied” includes, percent of extremely satisfied and satisfied; “Dissatisfied” includes percent of extremely dissatisfied and dissatisfied.
2.“—” means no this item in the year.
12. The R.O.C. citizens’ total domestic tourist traveling expenditure in 2008 was NT$ 184.2 billions, a decreased of 16% from that of 2007: Based on this survey, the average expense per trip for each person was NT$1,915 for domestic travel in 2008, a decrease of 3.7% from that of 2007.The types of expenditures, ranked in the order of their amount, were as follows: transportation, food and beverage, shopping, lodging, entertainment and other expenses. The total domestic tourist travel expenses by citizens of 12years or older in 2008 were estimated at NT$184.2 billions, a decrease of 16% from that of 2007.
Table 21 Average Expenses of Domestic Tourist Travel Per Person-Trip
Unit: NT$
|
Item |
2008 |
2007 |
Growth rate |
||
|
Total |
1,915 |
100% |
1,989 |
100% |
-3.7 |
|
Transportation |
511 |
27% |
495 |
25% |
3.2 |
|
Lodging |
330 |
17% |
316 |
16% |
4.4 |
|
Food and Beverage |
454 |
24% |
471 |
24% |
-3.6 |
|
Entertainment |
104 |
5% |
141 |
7% |
-26.2 |
|
Shopping |
413 |
22% |
421 |
21% |
-1.9 |
|
Other Expenses |
103 |
5% |
145 |
7% |
-29.0 |
Note: Other expenses include gifts, donations and tips.
Table 22 Average Expenses of Domestic Tourist Travel Per Person-Trip in 2008
By With/Without Lodging
Unit: NT$
|
Item |
Total |
Over-night Traveler |
Not over-night |
|
|
With lodging expenses |
Without lodging expenses |
|||
|
Total |
1,915 |
4,727 |
2,670 |
995 |
|
Transportation |
511 |
1,003 |
934 |
300 |
|
Lodging |
330 |
1,702 |
0 |
0 |
|
Food and Beverage |
454 |
985 |
613 |
278 |
|
Entertainment |
104 |
233 |
117 |
65 |
|
Shopping |
413 |
745 |
630 |
282 |
|
Other Expenses |
103 |
59 |
376 |
70 |
Note: Most of “over-night but without lodging expenses” were lodging in relatives or friends houses(94%); some stayed in free visitor centers or free camping grounds(6%).
B. Comparisons of Domestic Travel and Outbound Travel
1. Domestic travel rate for outbound travelers was 99%: During 2008, 93 % of all citizens took at least one domestic tourist trip; while 20% had at least one outbound travel. The average number of domestic trip per person was 4.81; while the average number of outbound travel per person was 0.37. Furthermore, we found that outbound travelers had a higher proportion of domestic travels than non-outbound travelers, 99% vs. 91%.
Table 23 Comparison of Domestic Travel vs. Outbound Travel in 2008
|
Status of Travel |
Domestic Tourist Travels |
Outbound Travels |
||||||||
|
1st Quarter |
2nd Quarter |
3rd Quarter |
4th Quarter |
Whole Year |
1st Quarter |
2nd Quarter |
3rd Quarter |
4th Quarter |
Whole Year |
|
|
Did not Travel |
28.6% |
35.2% |
35.5% |
36.0% |
7.5% |
94.0% |
93.0% |
92.0% |
93.9% |
80.4% |
|
Did Travel |
71.4% |
64.8% |
64.5% |
64.0% |
92.5% |
6.0% |
7.0% |
8.0% |
6.1% |
19.6% |
|
Average number of Trips per person |
1.42 |
1.11 |
1.21 |
1.07 |
4.81 |
0.09 |
0.10 |
0.10 |
0.08 |
0.37 |
|
Total number of trips by All Citizens |
28,305,000 person-trips 33,400,000 person-trips (under 12 yrs old included) |
22,175,000 person-trips 26,167,000 person-trips (under 12 yrs old included) |
24,231,000 person-trips 28,593,000 person-trips (under 12 yrs old included) |
21,486,000 person-trips 25,139,000 person-trips (under 12 yrs old included) |
96,197,000 person-trips 113,299,000 person-trips (under 12 yrs old included) |
2,102,839 |
2,229,395 |
2,258,027 |
1,874,911 |
8,465,172 |
Table 24 Proportions of Domestic Tourist Travels in
2008
Outbound Travelers vs. Non-outbound Travelers
Unit: %
|
Status |
Outbound Travelers (19.6%) |
Non-outbound Travelers (80.4%) |
|
Total |
100.0 |
100.0 |
|
Had Domestic Travel |
99.3 |
90.8 |
|
No Domestic Travel |
0.7 |
9.2 |
2. 77% of outbound tourists did not decrease the number of domestic trips due to outbound travels: During 2008, 23% of outbound tourists decreased the number of domestic trips due to oversea travel; while 77% expressed that their outbound travels had no effect on their domestic trip frequencies. From the cross tabulation between outbound and domestic travels, we found that most citizens had domestic trips but no outbound travel (73%), followed by 20% who had both domestic and outbound trips, and less than 1% who had outbound travel but no domestic trip.
Table 25 Outbound Travel Effect on Domestic Trips
|
Status |
Percentage |
|
Total |
|
|
No Effect |
|
|
Reducing domestic trips due to outbound travel |
Table 26 Domestic Travelers vs. Outbound Travelers in 2008
Unit: %
|
7.4 |
0.1 |
7.5 |
|
|
73.0 |
19.5 |
92.5 |
|
|
80.4 |
19.6 |
100.0 |
3. Outbound travelers’ male proportion, age and monthly income were on the average higher than domestic tourist travelers: Comparisons between months, we found that more tourists took domestic trips in February than in any other month, accounting for 14%; while more outbound trips were taken in July (10%). Gender-wise, domestic trips were taken by males and females evenly; while outbound trips taken by male out numbered females (57% to 43%); Age-wise, average age of domestic travelers was 38 years old, while outbound traveler was 42 years old on average. Based on monthly income, average monthly income of the domestic travelers (NT$24,462) was less than that of the outbound travelers (NT$32,108). As for occupation, student, housekeepers and services or sales workers were larger groups among domestic trips, while outbound travelers had more technician, services or sales workers, managers and supervisors, clerks, retirees, housekeepers or students.
Table 27 Characteristics Comparison between Domestic Tourists and Outbound Travelers in 2008
|
Characteristics |
Domestic Tourist |
Outbound Traveler |
|
Month |
more in February (13.7%) |
more in July (9.9%) |
|
Gender |
male female evenly divided |
more males(57.1%) |
|
Age |
Average Age:38 |
Average Age:42 |
|
Monthly Income |
Average monthly income NT$24,462 |
Average monthly income NT$32,108 |
|
Occupation |
More Students (15.5%) or Housekeepers (13.2%) or Services or sales workers (12.9%) |
More Technician (13.2%) or Services or sales workers (12.8%) or Managers or Supervisors (11.3%) or Administrative staffs (10.8%) or retirees (10.5%) or housekeepers (10.1%)or students(10.0%) |
Note: These data of outbound tourist’s traveling month, sex, and age were government statistical data.
4. Sightseeing, Recreation or Vacation was the main purpose for both domestic tourist trips and outbound travel trips: Most tourists took domestic travel for sightseeing, recreation or vacation purpose (79%), followed by visiting friends or relatives (20%). Most outbound travelers went overseas also for sightseeing, recreation or vacation purpose (60%), followed by business (26%).
Table 28 Comparison of the Trip Purposes in 2008
Domestic vs. Outbound
|
Domestic Tourist Trips |
Outbound Tourist Trips |
|||
|
Purpose of the Trip |
% |
Purpose of the Trip |
% |
|
|
Total |
100.0 |
Total |
100.0 |
|
|
Sightseeing, Recreation, Vacation |
Subtotal |
78.7 |
Sightseeing, Recreation, Vacation |
59.5 |
|
Pure Sightseeing Recreation, Vacation |
63.3 |
|||
|
Physical Exercising Vacation |
7.1 |
|||
|
Ecological Tour |
2.9 |
|||
|
Conference or Studying Tour |
0.7 |
|||
|
Religious Tour |
4.8 |
|||
|
Business |
1.0 |
Business |
25.5 |
|
|
Visiting friends or relatives |
19.9 |
Visiting friends or relatives |
13.0 |
|
|
- |
- |
Short-term learning or study |
1.6 |
|
|
Others |
0.4 |
Others |
0.4 |
|
Note:“—” means no sample in the cell.
5. Most tourists, domestic or outbound, took short distance trips: In 2008, 66% of the domestic tourist travels were within tourist’s own living region tours. For outbound travels, 87% of the trips were in nearby Asian countries; and more travelers visited Mainland China (36%) than any other place, followed by Japan (21%) and Hong Kong (9%).
Table 29 Destinations of outbound Travels for year 2008
|
Region |
Destination |
Region (%) |
Destination (%) |
|
China-Hong Kong-Macao |
Hong Kong |
44.4 (↓2.1) |
8.7 (↑0.5) |
|
Mainland China |
35.7 (↓4.2) |
||
|
Macao |
2.5 (↑0.7) |
||
|
Southeast Asia |
Thailand |
16.7 (↓0.8) |
4.4 (↓0.2) |
|
Malaysia |
2.8 (↑0.2) |
||
|
Singapore |
2.4 (↑0.6) |
||
|
Indonesia |
2.4 (↓0.9) |
||
|
Philippines |
2.0 (↑0.6) |
||
|
Vietnam |
2.4 (↓0.1) |
||
|
1.2 (↓0.5) |
|||
|
Myanmar |
0.1 (↑0.0) |
||
|
Brunei |
-(↓0.0) |
||
|
Northeast Asia |
Japan |
25.4 (↑2.6) |
20.5 (↑2.2) |
|
Korea |
4.7 (↑0.2) |
||
|
America |
U.S.A. |
6.9 (↑1.2) |
5.4 (↑0.7) |
|
Canada |
1.8 (↑0.9) |
||
|
Europe |
U.K. |
3.4 (↓2.1) |
0.5 (↓0.6) |
|
Netherlands |
0.4 (↑0.1) |
||
|
Belgium |
0.1 (↓0.2) |
||
|
France |
0.6 (↓1.3) |
||
|
Germany |
0.9 (↓1.9) |
||
|
Switzerland |
0.2 (↓0.9) |
||
|
Austria |
0.7 (↓0.2) |
||
|
Italy |
0.6 (↓0.3) |
||
|
Greece |
0.0 (↑0.0) |
||
|
0.6 (↓0.6) |
|||
|
Hungary |
0.3 (↓0.4) |
||
|
Spain |
0.1 (↓0.3) |
||
|
Portugal |
─ (↓0.1) |
||
|
Oceania |
Australia |
2.3 (↑0.3) |
1.8 (↑0.6) |
|
New Zealand |
0.3 (↓0.4) |
||
|
Palau |
0.2 (↑0.1) |
||
|
Africa |
South Africa |
0.1 (↓0.1) |
0.1 (↑0.1) |
|
Others |
Others |
2.4 (↑0.7) |
2.4 (↑0.7) |
Note: 1. Traveling regions were multi-choice.
2. The percentage in ( ) indicates change from 2007.
3. ”─”means no sample in the cell; “0.0”means the percentage was under 0.05.
6. North Region was the most important tourist source for both domestic and outbound tourist market: Analysis based on region of residence, we found that more domestic trips (45%) were taken by the residents of the North Region than any other region, followed by the South Region (28%) and Central Region(25%). And 54% of all outbound trips were taken by the residents of the North Region. The South Region (22%) and Central Region (20%) were in distant second. Therefore, North Region was the most important tourist source for both domestic and outbound tourist market.
Table 30 Distribution of Domestic and Outbound Trips
in 2008
By Region of Residence
|
Region of Residence |
Domestic Trips (%) |
Outbound Trips (%) |
|
Total |
100.0 |
100.0 |
|
North Region |
45.1 |
54.2 |
|
Central Region |
25.3 |
20.2 |
|
South Region |
27.5 |
22.0 |
|
East Region |
1.8 |
1.7 |
|
Kim-Mar Region |
0.3 |
1.9 |
7. Most domestic and outbound travelers took individual tours: More tourists took domestic or outbound trips (87% for domestic and 63% for outbound) by themselves than joining group tours. Only 4% of all domestic tourist trips were arranged by travel agencies, while 91% of outbound tours were arranged through travel agencies.
Table 31 Comparison of Types of Domestic and Outbound Travels in 2008
Unit: %
|
Item |
Domestic Travel |
Outbound Travel |
|
|
Type of Tour |
Individual Tour |
87.4 |
62.5 |
|
Group Tour |
12.6 |
37.5 |
|
|
Arrangement |
By Travel Agency |
4.0 |
90.5 |
|
Not by Travel Agency |
96.0 |
9.5 |
|
8. In 2008, the R.O.C. citizens’ total domestic tourist traveling expenditure was NT$ 184.2 billions, a 16.0% decrease from that of 2007; total expenditure for outbound travels was NT$ 413.4 billions, a 4.4% decrease from that of 2007: Average spending per domestic person-trip (stayed out one night or more and paied accommodation expenses) was NT$4,727. The R.O.C. citizens’ total domestic tourist traveling expenditures was NT$ 184.2 billions, a decrease of 16.0% from that of 2007. The total expenditures of all outbound tourist travels was NT$413.4 billions in 2008. In addition, before and after the trip, there was a total spending of NT$3,500 in Taiwan for each person-trip. (It included the expenses of buying trip necessities and gifts, transportation expenses between home and airport, printing camera films, and repairing suitcases and other traveling equipments). We estimated that the total expenditures related to the trip spent by outbound tourists before going abroad and returning to Taiwan was NT$29.6 billions (US$0.939 billions).
Table 32 Expenditure of Domestic and Outbound Travels in 2008
|
Domestic Travel |
Outbound Travel |
|
Note: Number inside parenthesis indicates percent change from 2007 to 2008.
9. 32%~48% of people had plans for domestic travels for the next season: For the next season domestic travel planning, the highest proportion was planning for travels for the 1st Quarter of 2008. (Lunar New Year holidays)
Table 34 Next Season Travel Plans
Unit:%
|
Item |
Plans for 2008 2nd Quarter |
Plans for 2008 3rd Quarter |
Plans for 2008 4th Quarter |
Plans for 2009 1st Quarter |
|
Total |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
|
planned domestic Travel |
33.4 |
40.2 |
32.8 |
48.4 |
|
planned outbound Travel |
4.8 |
4.9 |
3.9 |
3.1 |
|
planned both domestic and outbound travels |
4.2 |
4.9 |
3.5 |
2.8 |
|
planned neither domestic nor outbound travels |
57.6 |
50.0 |
59.8 |
45.7 |